Bay Area Equestrian Network - logo

Equine Legal Soluitons

   
Legal
Questions and Answers for the Horse Community
   
Current Q&A / Archives
   
By Rachel Kosmal McCart

 
           
         
Please note that the following information is not intended to be legal advice or to create an attorney client relationship. Before relying on any information, you should contact an attorney licensed to practice in your state. See also BAEN's legal disclaimer. To submit a question for this column, email your question to info@equinelegalsolutions.com. Please identify yourself as well as any other parties involved so that we can be sure to avoid conflicts in interest in answering your question. We will keep all parties’ identities confidential. By submitting your inquiry to this column, you grant permission for your inquiry to be published and for your inquiry to be edited for length, grammar or clarity. Due to space limitations, we cannot publish an answer to every question we receive, but we do try to provide an unpublished answer by email or telephone. View previous Q&A's in the Legal Solutions Archives.
   
         
 

   
Nonpaying Boarder – What To Do?

Q:  We operate a boarding stable in California.  One of our boarders has not paid board for over six months.  How do we go about lien selling the horse?  We have requested payment every month with no response.

A:  California Civil Code Division 3, Part 4, Title 14, Chapter 6.7 Section 3080 provides California boarding stables with an automatic lien upon horses in their possession for unpaid board.  This lien is often referred to as an “agister’s lien.”  No filing is necessary – the lien continues so long as the horses are in the stable’s possession. The stable can use any peaceable and lawful means to prevent the horses from leaving the property, such as padlocking the horses’ enclosures.  If the horses’ owners arrive to take the horses, the boarding stable can call law enforcement to assist them in preventing the horses from leaving. 

However, the boarding stable cannot lawfully sell the horses to satisfy the lien without a court order.  Typically, the simplest method of obtaining a court order is to take the boarder to small claims court and obtain a judgment for the past due board.   The boarding stable can request its expenses as part of the claim, such as attorneys’ fees, court costs and process serving costs, and the current limit in California small claims court is $7,500. 

Often, the most difficult part of bringing a small claims court suit is locating and serving the boarder.  California small claims rules provide for service by certified mail, but certified mail service seldom works, because most nonpaying boarders know that no good news ever arrives by certified mail, and therefore they will not sign for the certified mail.  Often, while the stable waits for the certified mail postcard evidencing signature to come back, the deadline for serving the boarder expires, requiring the stable to obtain a new court date and start the service process all over again. Meanwhile, the stable is  continuing to feed and care for the boarder’s horses, costing the stable additional resources.  To locate and serve the nonpaying boarder promptly, there is no substitute for hiring an experienced, professional process server.

Once the stable has obtained a judgment against the boarder, the boarder will have 30 days to pay the judgment.  If the boarder pays the judgment, the stable must release the horses to the boarder. If the boarder has not paid the judgment within 30 days, the stable can then petition the court for an order permitting them to sell the horses.  If the stable sells the horses, it must follow certain notice requirements for the sale – see Section 3080.17

What happens if the stable doesn’t obtain a court order or otherwise follow the statutory procedure before selling the boarder’s horses?  The boarder may have a legal claim for “conversion,” which is essentially a civil form of theft, in the amount of the horses’ fair market value, plus any reasonable expenses that the boarder incurs in pursuing the horses.  However, the boarding stable would still have a legal claim for the outstanding board amount (less any proceeds that the stable received from the sale of the horses), and the amount of this claim typically exceeds the horses’ worth.  Therefore, a boarder’s suit for conversion would only be worthwhile if the horses’ fair market value greatly exceeds the amount of outstanding board, which is not usually the case.

Boarding stables can avoid the lengthy and costly statutory lien sale process by having a boarding contract specifying that the stable has the right to sell the horses after a certain period of unpaid board and that the boarder waives his or her rights under the California agister’s lien statutes.  Equine Legal Solutions’ boarding forms package includes a boarding contract containing the necessary clauses.
    

 
             
   
About the Author: Rachel Kosmal McCart, the founder of Equine Legal Solutions, is a lifelong horsewoman and experienced lawyer. Equine Legal Solutions, the Legal Counsel with Horse SenseTM, offers a full range of legal services for the horse community, including dispute resolution, customized contracts and risk management assessment.
   
           
    Copyright © 2006 Equine Legal Solutions and the Bay Area Equestrian Network. All rights reserved. The above article is the property of the Author and may not be duplicated or redistributed in any way without permission.
    
   

Return to top      Return to current Q&A      Return to Archives

SITE INDEX     SUBMIT AN AD     MEMBER SERVICES     ABOUT US     CONTACT US     HOME