Bill No:
SB 1852, Horses:
hire and boarding standards - last updated 11/30/04
New bill introduced could have
major negative consequences. Bill in CA Senate. SB 1852 by Senator
Edward Vincent (D-Inglewood) would require owners of facilities
that board horses or rent horses as a means of income, to provide
exercise at least once per week to each horse. In addition, the
measure requires that there be "adequate" drainage in
each pen. This measure could easily have many negative impacts, as
the definition for "boarding horses" could be
interpreted very broadly. Please alert horse owners that they
should contact the Senate Business and Professions Committee
Chair, Liz Figueroa, by phone: 916-445-3090; fax: 916-327-8755; or
email: senator.figeroa@sen.ca.gov
with their opposition to this measure.
| At the
Senator's request, the first hearing set for April 7,
2004, was cancelled and there have been no further
hearings on the matter. |
SENATE
COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS
Senator
Liz Figueroa, Chair
Bill
No: Senate Bill 1852
Author: Vincent
As
Introduced: February
20, 2004
Fiscal:
No
SUBJECT:
Horses: hire
and boarding standards.
SUMMARY:
Establishes standards for the treatment of
horses at boarding facilities.
Existing
law:
1)
Sets standards of humane treatment of equines that are kept
at facilities that provide horses for hire.
Specifically, requires:
a)
An equine enclosure be of sufficient size so the equine can
comfortably stand up, turn around, and lie down.
Additionally, requires the enclosure be kept free of
excessive urine and waste matter.
b)
Paddocks and corrals be of adequate size for the equine to
move about freely.
c)
Buildings, premises, and conveyances used in conjunction
with equines be kept free of sharp objects, protrusions, or other
materials that are likely to cause injury.
d)
Equines be supplied with nutritionally adequate feed and
clean water in accordance with standards published by the
Cooperative Extension of the Division of Agricultural Sciences of
the University of California.
2)
Authorizes a peace officer, officer of a humane society, or
officer of an animal control or animal regulation department of a
public agency to issue a citation to a person or entity keeping
horses or other equine animals for hire if the person or entity
fails to meet standards of humane treatment regarding the keeping
of horses or other equine animals.
3)
Provides that citations issued pursuant to this section
shall require the person cited to pay a civil penalty in the
amount of $100 for each violation, and $100 for each day the
violation continues. Further,
any person who violates this section may be prosecuted by the
district attorney of the county in which the violation occurred or
the city attorney of the city in which the violation occurred.
This
bill applies the same standards that currently apply to
facilities that provide horses for hire and would additionally
require:
1)
Adequate drainage in an equine enclosure.
2)
Equines kept at the facility be given regular exercise
time, weather and health permitting, as specified.
Further, specifies that reasonable efforts should be made
to provide exercise time daily but in no event should the exercise
occur less than once a week in accordance with standards published
by the Cooperative Extension of the Division of Agricultural
Sciences of the University of California.
3)
The exercise area be a corral, arena, pasture, or other
area large enough to accommodate running and other natural equine
behavior.
4)
The exercise program be part of the boarding agreement
between the boarding facility and the owner of the equine.
5)
A person or entity keeping a horse or other equine animal
for boarding to provide the owner of the horse or equine with a
copy of the standards of treatment as specified.
FISCAL
EFFECT: Unknown
COMMENTS:
1.
Purpose.
The sponsor of this measure is the Fund for Animals.
According to the sponsor, many horses at commercial
boarding stables are excessively confined, in some cases for weeks
and months, with little and often no exercise.
Many suffer debilitating health problems as a result.
Existing animal protection laws, particularly with respect
to horses, are vague and nonspecific.
There currently are no standards or
requirements that apply to boarding facilities that rent stall
space to owner of horses. The
issue of excessive confinement of a roaming species, specifically
as it pertains to horses in increasingly urbanized stable
environments, needs to be addressed.
The sponsor believes that this issue can be easily
addressed through existing boarding agreements with individual
owners and the facility once there are established standards.
2.
Background.
Many horses in typical commercial board and care stables
live in pipe pens and box stalls.
The average stall is 12x12.
For a fee, sometimes between $200 to $500 per month,
the stables provide them basic food and water.
More than 80% of domesticated horses in the U.S. live in
urban areas and boarding facilities.
The Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights (AVAR)
indicates that many boarding facilities only provide the minimum
of care needed for the well-being of horses.
Boarded horses are often subjected to standing in waste or
damp soil, resulting in thrush or hoof rot.
AVAR notes that because many horses are not allowed to
exercise, they are subject to abnormal hoof growth, lameness,
tendon and ligament damage, and gastric ulcers.
Further, lack of normal exercise can cause stereotypic
behaviors, such as cribbing, wind sucking, excessive pawing, and
self-mutilation.
3.
Arguments
in Support. Veterinarians
from various areas of the state have written to speak to the issue
of the need for exercise in horses.
All attest to the importance of exercise for horses and a
lack of exercise can lead to the physical and mental deterioration
of the horse.
4.
Suggested
Amendment. The
bill should specify that boarding is for commercial purposes only.
Committee staff understands that it was the intent of the
Author that this measure only apply to commercial boarding
facilities that are open to the public not private facilities.
The Author can address this by taking the following
amendments:
a)
Page 2, line 9: strike
out "boarding" and insert "commercial boarding
purposes"
b)
Page 2, line 30: after
"Equines" insert "boarded at commercial boarding
facilities"
c)
Page 4, line 5: strike
out "boarding" insert "commercial boarding
purposes"
SUPPORT
AND OPPOSITION:
Support:
-
Fund
for Animals (Sponsor)
-
Association
of Veterinarians for Animal Rights
-
California
Federation for Animal Legislation
-
Contra
Costa Humane Society
-
Individual
Veterinarians
Opposition:
Consultant:
Robin Hartley
|